Previous
The Atlantis of Plato from the controversy and the scientific rigor.
Added: (Thu Jul 28 2005)
Source: AtlantisDiscovery.com
class=laceNoticiaFuente
href="http://216.239.39.104/translate_c?hl=es&langpair=es%7Cen&u=http://discoveryatlantis.sytes.net/"
target=_blank>http://DiscoveryAtlantis.sytes.net/
The Scientific Atlantis.
The Atlantis of Plato from the controversy and the scientific rigor.
Hispanic-Cuban investigator sends
a new book on the Atlantis from a scientific optics. One is paleográfico,
filológico and documentary the study deeper and extensive made to
date.
/DiscoveryAtlantis.sytes.net/ The investigator
Georgeos Diaz-Montexano has recently published an
extensive work that gathers the work of investigation more extensive than it
exists on so looked for and to date not econtrada Atlantic civilization that
Plato it exactly denominated with the name of Atlantis and that disappeared
because of tsunami.
Diaz-Montexano has been able to reunite
to the greater amount of evidences and scientific datas of quality on the
Atlantis. He has been first in sending a scientific report to UNESCO on the
finding of possible archaeological rest discovered under waters of the Straits
of Gibraltar and the coasts of Andalusia in several points, from Barbate to
Cadiz and Huelva, defending before UNESCO that could be rest of the own not
looked for Atlantis or less - also without Tartessos success.
Not theory
exists at the moment other that can to reunite so many points that agrees with
the words or descriptions of Plato like that Hispanic-Cuban investigator
Georgeos defends Diaz-Montexano , who has managed to
settle down that the theory that he defends of Atlantis like an empire or
emporio Ibero-Moroccan (that also Jonas Berghman defends, for the African part),
is only that has the true probabilities of success in a future, more and more
next one.
This reality bothers or infuriates enough, on the one hand, to
which they create in other theories or in the masterful affirmations of
determined "spiritual" and by another one the most radical and nihilistas
skeptics than they fully deny until the right to investigate this historical
enigma.
As he exposes Georgeos well Diaz :
"... only a few points of which I have been able to verify and that they
sustain to my hypothesis and theory, would be enough to convince any rational,
serious person, who is not fanatical and who truely looks for the truth, she is
where she is, she is as she is and she falls that falls. They would be more than
sufficient to convince until most skeptical of the planet, at least of a fact,
that he is the following one: if Atlantis, like civilization, empire and a great
city or emporio, existed sometimes, if it really existed, it only can have been
between the southwest of Iberia or Spain and the northwest of Morocco... ",
because - according to this investigator the following points are
unquestionable:
1. The island or peninsula (in Greek ' NHSOS ') of
Atlantis was "of the side of", "next to" or "ahead" (in Greek ' PRO ') of the
Columns of Hercules (Gibraltar)
2. A region of the ' NHSOS' Atlantis was
called ' Gadeira (Cádiz) and extended - or arrived until the same Columns of
Hercules (Gibraltar)
3. The ' NHSOS' Atlantis was next to the coasts of
the "arm of sea or gulf of the Atlantic" (in Greek ' ATLANTIKOU PELAGOS '),
present Gulf of Cadiz.
4. After passing the ' NHSOS' Atlantis, "other
islands" existed (in Greek ' ALLAS NHSOI'), "opposite and upwards", like it
needs in texts oldest writings in Greek and Latin. These islands would be the
Madeiras, Azores, the Islands Brita'nicas and Ireland, and had opposite, one
"terra company/signature" or continent (in Greek ' HPEIROS '), that could be
Greenland, or - although less probable part of Canada and North
America.
5. From the NHSOS Atlantis, located "above", "on" (in Greek
HÜPER) or next to of the Columns of Hercules (Gibraltar), it affirms Plato that
went into by all the interior until arriving at the Thyrrenia and Asia, by the
part of Europe, whereas by the part of Africa (Libya), they did it until Libya
and Egypt; which confirms that the island or Atlantic peninsula or of Atlantis
was next to the Columns of Hercules, to the West of the Mediterranean, because
besides to be in that situation (as it affirms Plato), if we analyzed the
geographic logic, we observed that towards the east they are the towns of the
Mediterranean that colonized Atlantis and towards the west they are the other
islands (Madeiras, Canarîas, British, Ireland, Iceland, You embarrass, the
Caribbean, etc.) and after these islands is the continent (possibly Greenland
and part of Canada and the U.S.A.).
As he exposes well
Georgeos Diaz:
"... Everything fits with a so
evident logic that it is alarming that still exists people whom they do not love
to see these facts, that they demonstrate, of unquestionable way that - if
Atlantis existio ' - it only could be closely together of the Columns of
Hercules, between the southwest of Iberia and the northwest of Morocco. As far
as the location of the Acropolis, this would be in some point of the coast, very
near of the Columns of Hercules (Gibraltar), and to about fifty stages of the
coast, that is, to about 9 or 10 kilometers, according to precise Plato. He is
absurd to continue looking for Atlantis in no island of the interior of the
Mediterranean or in no other island of the outside of the Atlantic, and much
less in America or Indonesia. The data that offer Plato are unquestionable. If a
city really existed on which Plato would base his writing on the Atlantis, all
the indications aim towards an only direction: the triangle formed by the
Columns of Hercules (Gibraltar, Tariff, Barbate, Trafalgar), the region of
Gadeira (Cadiz, Huelva) and the region of the Atlas (Atlantic coast of Morocco).
The solution of the final mystery, that is to say, if the Acropolis or city of
Atlantis existed or did not exist, will only depend if it is discovered in the
coasts of Iberia or the coasts of Morocco, as also Jonas Berghman defends the
Swedish colleague... "
The Hispanic-Cuban investigator calls the
attention on other points described with absolute clarity in the story of Plato:
6. The Atlantes had a very old writing (deductible dates of the text,
from the 9000 to end of the Age of the Bronze). The tartessios have been the
only town of the antiquity (of all West of the old World) recognized to have the
system of writing, laws and treaties of greater antiquity of all Earth, nothing
less than 6000 years of the times of Estrabon, that is, for 8000
years.
7. An island or peninsula (NHSOS) that maintained contact (wars,
colonizations, etc.) with towns of the Mediterranean like the Greeks; therefore
they would have to be in the propose area as cradle of Atlantis Greek
unquestionable archaeological evidences of contact with the old ones.
8.
The main city or the Acropolis of Atlantis was in a circular island, near the
coast, surrounded by several concentric circular pits, where some canalized the
water of the sea and from the center of the island to the outside, that is,
until the sea, there was a straight channel.
Points 1, 2, 3, mentioned 4
and 5 above - aims Georgeos Diaz - "... force
to watch at an only area of all the planet earth, the included/understood one by
the island or the Iberian Peninsula, Gibraltar, Cadiz and the Atlas (Morocco)...
"
Point 6 also forces to us to watch towards Iberia, because of all West
of the Mediterranean, Iberia is the only NHSOS (isla/península) where attests a
writing almost as old as the one of the Atlantis. What added to the four
previous points it discards the mere chance completely.
Point 7 also
forces to direct the glance to us towards Iberia, because it is the only
peninsula or great island located in the extreme West of the Mediterranean, next
to the Columns of Hercules (Gibraltar), with a called region Gadeira and next to
the Atlas (Morocco) that in addition maintained real contacts with the Greek
world.
On point 8 it is necessary to emphasize that, also in Iberia, it
is where only have been physical tests - in this case, architectonic and
archaeological of the existence of at least two cities with this same scheme
that were founded on the Age of Cobre and that lasted until end of the Age of
the Bronze, the one in Jaén and other in Madrid.
On the other hand, in
Iberia it has also appeared the greater concentration of all the planet of
identical symbolic reasons to the scheme of Atlantis of several concentric ring
with a channel that leaves from the center and that arrives until the outside of
the ring, present in the petroglifos and the decorations of Iberian Tartésicas
ceramics and.
Although these 8 points would be enough by themselves, we
can consider other less important, as also it indicates Diaz-Montexano
the historical traditions and legend about the Atlantis and the
Atlanteans and until a genealogy of kings Atlanteans (put in doubt by some)
present in the historiography until the medieval times, have not been only
registered in the Iberian Peninsula.
Georgeos Diaz-Montexano
considers a serious investigator who follows a method and an own
methodology. It follows, or rather "it persecutes" - as the same one emphasizes
the scientific method. Others prefer to follow esoteric, ufológico, xenogenético
the method extraterrestrial; the nihilista or radical escépticismo, etc.
Everyone must right to use the method that considers agreed more with its
intellectual or spiritual level. It is a right of all the human
beings.
If somebody prefers to believe more in extraterrestrial Von
Däniken and its hypotheses to draw its conclusions on the Atlantis before to
guide itself by the work deeper than never it is made on the Plato's Atlantis,
from the oldest sources known written in Greek, Latin and Egyptian, and in the
geographic tests, toponímicas, geologic, sismológicas and archaeological, that
appear exposed in the investigations of Georgeos Diaz well , it is
in its right, and all we must respect that right, although we do not agree. We
like or no, thus she works the search of the knowledge. Everyone decides like
looking for the truth.
Summarizing: these simple points gathered in the
Pack-Ebook of the "Scientific Atlantis" of Georgeos the Diaz-Montexano
, demonstrate that the most correct theory, the one than adjusts to the
truth, is more the one who defend the Swedish Jonas Berghman and the
Hispanic-Cuban Georgeos Diaz-Montexano , in relation to Atlantis
like a kingdom or emporio Ibero-Mauritano of the Age of the Bronze, whose heart
or central axis it was in the Columns of Hercules (Gibraltar), and who would
succumb before the impact of great tsunami, preceded of several earthquakes...
but already says it will:
"there is no worse blind
person, who this that does not want to see"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Official WebSite about the Georgeos Diaz-Montexano's book of the "Scientific
Atlantis":
href="http://www.atlantisdiscovery.com/georgeos-diaz/">http://www.atlantisdiscovery.com/georgeos-diaz/
|
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; COLOR: #b61d0c">Datos de Contacto
: |
|
Datos de Contacto: Maria Fdez-Valmayor href="mailto:info@arqueotour.com">info@arqueotour.com class=laceNoticiaTexto href="mailto:info@arqueotour.com">
href="http://www.AtlantisDiscovery.com/news/">http://www.AtlantisDiscovery.com/news/ |